Is it entirely true? Did God establish only one true Church? Before I comment on that important issue, I will ask you to review the serious issues currently transpiring in the world today—is the Covid-19 vaccine a true vaccine? Is there truly a pandemic?
Some people believe it’s all a hoax. Of course, we know the Chinese virus exists, and who doubts it originated in a Communist China lab? However the Covid-19 vaccines, none of them, have been approved by the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) or any of the other Federal Agencies listed below. They’ve been only approved for experimental vaccines and they’ve not been properly tested.
Therefore, being only an experimental vaccine it cannot be called a true vaccine. Consequently, it’s a hoax vaccine. If the vaccines were true vaccines, why did the Federal Agencies FDA, EUA, HRS, HSS, CDC and the FFDCA refuse to approve them? For verification, see EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION AND FDA’s RELATED AUTHORITIES, listed below.
Knowledge regarding these issues could save your life, more importantly—your salvation. The recorded facts concerning the Chinese virus, the Covid-19 (experimental) vaccine, and the (questionable) pandemic are shown below.
DICTIONARY DEFINITIONS FOR HOAX
“To trick into believing or accepting as genuine something false and often preposterous”
“A trick or something else that is intended to deceive someone: “A hoax led thousands to donate to a fake charity.” “A cruel/elaborate hoax”
“Something intended to deceive or defraud”
How will vaccine recipients be informed about the benefits and risks of any vaccine that receives an emergency use authorization? The FDA Rule states that the FDA must ensure that recipients of the vaccine under an EUA are informed, to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances, that FDA has authorized the emergency use of the vaccine, of the known and potential benefits and risks, the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown, that they have the option to accept or refuse the vaccine, and of any available alternatives to the product.
Here’s what the Covid-19 Vaccine Pfizer Consent Form requires of persons to sign before they can receive the jab (other vaccine provider documentation is similar). Typically, this information is communicated in a patient “fact sheet.” The FDA posts these fact sheets on their website.
“I understand that This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 for use in individuals of age 16 years and older; and the emergency use of this product only.” Emphasis added
Moreover, don’t look for your insurance policy to help you because experimental vaccines are not covered. Nor is liability protection applicable. See EUA section sections 564, 564A, and 564B. These codes show they do not confer explicit liability protections for stakeholders who carry out any activity under these authorities.
EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION AND FDA’s RELATED AUTHORITIES
Under most circumstances, drugs, medical devices, and biologics may only be introduced into interstate commerce if they have been approved, cleared, or licensed by FDA. Under certain circumstances, however, FDA may permit a medical product to be provided to patients outside the standard regulatory framework. One of these circumstances is if the Secretary of HRS (Health and Human Services) declares, pursuant to §564 of the FFDCA (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act), that an emergency or threat exists due to CBRN (a chemical, biological, radiologic, or nuclear agent), in which case the HRS Secretary may temporarily authorize the emergency use of an unapproved product or the unapproved use of an approved product.
As a result, the FDA has determined that the Covid-19 vaccine is only an emergency experimental vaccine.
FACT-CHECKING THE FACT-CHECKERS
Are what you're reading, seeing and hearing is the truth? How do you know? If you use one of these links, FactCheck.org, the project of the Annenberg Public Center, you’ll receive a conservative slant with a more than likely biased opinion. If you use New York Times fact checking, you’ll receive a liberal slant with a biased opinion (check it out if you doubt it). If you use Snopes fact-checking, you’ll receive information concocted from a husband and wife team (not any more-they are now divorced) requesting from their readers: “What questions do you have? Help Snopes investigate rumors around the novel coronavirus by sending us your tips.” Emphasis in original
What odds would you give that such tips and information are reliable? The lack of consensus among fact-checkers arises from the challenge of verifying the accuracy of claims. Results show that fact-checkers perform only mediocre on outright falsehoods or obvious truths. The agreement rate amongst fact checkers is much lower for statements in the more ambiguous scoring range (i.e. “Half True” or “Mostly False”). Because fact-checkers rarely evaluate the same statement and disagree more often than one might suppose, fact-checking often falls short.
Did the fact-checkers who claimed the Covid-19 vaccine was not experimental read the following Emergency Use Authorization and FDA’s Related Authorities which clearly states?
“Under most circumstances, drugs, medical devices, and biologics may only be introduced into interstate commerce if they have been approved, cleared, or licensed by the FDA. Under certain circumstances, however, FDA may permit a medical product to be provided to patients outside the standard regulatory framework. One of these circumstances is, if the HHS (Secretary of Health and Human Services) declares, pursuant to §564 of the FFCDA (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act), that an emergency or threat exists due to a CBRN (chemical, biological, radiologic, or nuclear agent), in which case the HHS Secretary may temporarily authorize the emergency use of an unapproved product or the unapproved use of an approved product.” Emphasis added.
The HHS Secretary has confirmed that the Covid-19 vaccine is unapproved. Being that it’s officially unapproved—then it can only be considered experimental! A horse by any other name is still a horse.
So, what’s to be believed? Should the horrible stories regarding the Chinese virus that you read, see and hear be taken for gospel or as Pinocchio’s--or perhaps murky?
Should you believe Bill Gates who says from one side of his mouth (in his own words), limit 500 million people on earth, while from the other side of his mouth, he vies to extend life via the Covid-19 vaccines? Which way is it, Bill? Or should you review the terrifying coronavirus stories with open mindedness for the sake of CAUTION?
There are many reasons to be cautious concerning the Covid-19 vaccine, but nothing is more devastating than aborted baby parts being injected into your body. Every Christian should avoid the use of vaccines that use aborted baby parts. Knowingly accepting such vaccine is equally as sinful as abortion itself.
The U.S Conference of Catholic Bishops and Committee on Pro-life Activities posted a statement online and social media. It stated:
“The Johnson & Johnson vaccine was tested and is produced with abortion-derived cell lines, raising moral concerns”.
They went on to say:
The AstraZeneca and Janssen vaccines raise additional moral concerns because an abortion-derived cell line is used not only for testing, but also in development and production”.
As you can see, even the liberal Novus Ordo “Catholic” Church condemns this abominable practice.
The use of baby parts by Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca and Janssen, offend God. Aborting babies is clearly and act of murder. (Exodus) 20:13) “Thou shalt not kill”.
As a Christian these above vaccines using aborted baby parts should not, under any circumstances, be injected into your body.
Heed what The U.S Conference of Catholic Bishops and Committee on Pro-life Activities posted online and in social media, and, pay special attention to God’s Words in Exodus 20:13.
Choose God or Satan--the choice, as always, is yours.
Regarding the opening statement:
“DID GOD ESTABLISH ONLY ONE TRUE CHURCH”?
God made it absolutely clear—He established only one true Church—The Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church. Not thousands of splinter churches. His Church, the Catholic Church started on the day of Pentecost---did yours start that day? God does not accept or bless the Johnny-come-lately churches that distort His Words. His Church was not meant to be cloned; it is not one big melting pot and cannot be replicated.
Pope after Pope reaffirmed the dogma Outside the Church—“There is No Salvation”.
Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum (#14), May 5, 1824:
“It is impossible for the most true God, who is truth itself, the best, the wisest Provider, and the Rewarder of good men, to approve all sects who profess false teachings which are often inconsistent with one and another and contradictory, and to confer eternal rewards on their members… by faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism… This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church.”
The following are God’s Words and teachings taken from Scripture:
“I have other sheep, which are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will hear My voice; and they will become one flock with one shepherd”.
Matthew 7:15, 16
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. By their fruits you shall know them”
St. Paul cried out aloud, again and again, to all men, to all times, and to all places that, “if anyone announces a new dogma, let him be anathematized!”
The wicked are alienated from the womb; they have gone astray from the womb; they have spoken false things.”
“Woe to you when men shall bless you: for according to these things did their fathers to the false prophets
Our Lord said: “Thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build my Church (singular not plural), and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”